squirrel235

If you do not mention what Kurds suffered in Diyarbak?r Links of London Charms, no one will accept that victimization. Kurds represent the group that was victimized the most. Still, there is not a single article in the referendum package that will improve the situation for Kurds, is there? We cannot say ,,no" to the amendments. But we do not have any reason to say ,,yes" either because these arrangements have been made without taking Kurds into consideration. Will the changes to the structure of the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK) and the Constitutional Court not have any effect on the Kurdish people? I am not comparing the amendments with current practice. Of course, they are better than the current situation. But I am Links of London I Charm my reaction. I am telling the government, ,,I have been victimized and I have suffered, but you have not taken any steps to improve the situation for Kurds." The amendments you propose do not satisfy me, so I do not go to the polls, I say. This is what you fail to see. Why didn't you lend support to the article concerning party closures? Weren't you supposed to support that amendment? If only that article failed to pass while all other articles were easily approved, we are not to be blamed. The AK Party had the power to pass it. Aren't there Kurdish civil servants or disabled Kurds? Aren't there Kurdish women, children or victims who are Links of London M Charm affected by the current structure of the judiciary? The package fails to satisfy me, in a nutshell. Ask a number of times, and my response will be the same. The package is far from satisfying me as a human being and as a politician. I am not comparing Sept. 12 with the current situation. Already, no one is discussing the individual articles. Listen to the politicians. Are they talking about the content? But the package is raising the standing of living for all of us, isn't it? We, too, care about these steps. But if democratization, transformation or change does not happen, and if the tutelary regime does not disappear, this is because there are Kurds here. If you do not take steps to ease conditions for Kurds, it will not satisfy me. Throughout the history of the republic, there were three things which were Links of London O Charm as obstacles to change. The first one was communism, and it's gone. What were the two that remained? The Kurdish issue and Shariah. The status quo and the tutelary mentality survive by leaning on these two factors which they use as threats in the face of demands for change. And the Kurdish issue is the most complicated one.